Tuesday, November 13, 2007

The New Big Three are meshing

Before the season starts, speculation is on about who will be the primary offence (Pierce or Garnett or Allen). I think the consensus concludes that it will be between Garnett and Pierce, through the high/low post, while Allen will wait for the double-team.

Bethlehem Shoals of FanHouse has posted an interesting observation. Shoals compares the New Three's game with Spurs' trio as follow,

But whereas as the serene Tim Duncan has remained the philosophical center of the Spurs, the Celts orient themselves around Paul Pierce--perhaps the most flawed of the team's trio of All-Stars ... he's expected to play to his greatest strength: Pure, unadulterated go-for-self scoring.


Even though Pierce may not be their best player, Shoals believes that the flaw in his game should be viewed as "honest, indefatigable scoring to the table, which at his level is a very valuable commodity."

We have seen how well Celtics have played so far. They won games by the margins of 20, 3, 26, 23 and 11 respectively. While Garnett has streamlined his rebounding and passing game, Pierce and sometimes Allen looks for their shots. If and when Pierce struggles, the other two compensates (Allen won it in OT in the second game).

I have to tip my hat off to Danny Ainge, who "figures out a way (bringing in two of the most adaptable all-stars) to neutralize Pierce's drawbacks while still allowing him to do what he does best".

As Shoals sums up, "that's what makes this Big Three such an ingenious combination."

Thursday, November 8, 2007

Commercial ad by the New Big Three

One of the new ESPN commercial, using the movie 'Hoosiers' as storyline.






They actually have some stuff put on Jeff Van Gundy's cheeks that makes it looks like he has been crying.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Roundup the first week

As the end of first week of the season approaches, we have already been entertained with a few surprises (especially if you are fan of the Bulls, the Pacers or the Heat). But here comes an interesting one.

According to Peter May, the respectful pro-sport journalist, the #1 defensive team in the NBA, in terms of field goal percentage (35.9%), is the Boston Celtics. And not only are they tops in that category, they also were third in points allowed (article).

I should point out that Celtics have had a relative easy schedule so far (played only two games). Both wins, however, are against play-off teams with pretty good offence.

So the sign is there, with fresh legs and light travelling schedule. Let's see if they can keep this up.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

SI Front-Cover for 2007/08 Season Preview


Doc Rivers' response: “They honored our guys on the cover, but shouldn’t San Antonio be on the cover?” he said of the defending NBA champs. “We’re not San Antonio. We haven’t done anything yet.”

Friday, October 19, 2007

Celtics-Knicks Game Highlights

The new Celtics debut at the Garden.







It doesn't feel like a preseason warm-up, does it.

Friday, October 12, 2007

Three-teams Race to the Conference Final

Around this time of the NBA calender, you read prediction about which team will win the conference anywhere you go. So let me immerse myself to this role play.

No, i am not going to hard sell you the Celtics except saying this, the chance of Boston to get there is better than 1 in 4. But there are few other teams which are rated higher than the Celtics by many experts. The Bulls, the Pistons, and may be the Cavaliers, from top of my head.

The Pistons are definitely a threat. With the core group of Billups, Hamilton, Prince and Wallace, Mcdyess, they have the superior match-up against the Celtics' triple-threat, either in isolation or in transition. I'm looking forward to their first match-up in regular season.

Many have rated the Bulls the top team in the east, based on their toughness and deep run in last season playoff. Somehow i feel the Celtics will have a better chance if facing them, with Pierce and Garnett playing the low/high post game, verse the Bulls' perimeter game.

The Cavaliers are probably less a threat at this stage, as they're still trying to bring back the full team from last season. Let's give them a bit more time.

OK, the above is based on what we have already known.

What about the thing we don't know yet, such as .....
(it's in today's sport news) the possibility of Kobe Bryant be traded .....

My first reaction is, to subscribe every cable sports TV available and to start re-arranging my appointment schedule for the next few months.

Seriously, to make this trade possible, the other team must have enough assets to offer and deep pocket to take on Bryant's contract, and he will only be interested in playing for a title contender. So there are only handful of teams qualified, and i am assuming that Lakers will cross out those teams that are competing in the same conference.

So here are my two possible scenerios (the number in bracket is how many years remaining in contract):

<1> Trade Bryant (3 yrs) to Detroit, for Richard Hamilton (3 yrs), Jason Maxiell (1 yr), Rodney Stuckey (2 yrs) or Ronald Murray (1 yr) plus other bench players. Bryant will team up with Billups, Prince, Wallace and to become the all defence-team of the league.

This is purely from my speculation. But the possible trade will meet both teams' need. Lakers will get Hamilton and Stuckey to somewhat fill-in the vaccum, in the catagory of total point per game and in defence, and to build for the future prospect of Stuckey and Bynum. In addition, Lakers will also add Maxiell to strength their rebound and interior defence catagory, Detroit, needless to say, will get another shot to the Final, with most of their core group intact. I am, however, assuming that Bryant doesn't mind to move from LA to Detroit (i could imagine it'll be a culture shock to him). A question remains is how Detroit's offer can beat the next team (below) for the trade.

<2> Trade Bryant to Chicago, for Tyrus Thomas (1 yr), Ben Gordon (1 yr), Chris Duhon (1 yr), Thabo Sefolosha (1 yr), Viktor Khryapa (1 yr) and may be another bench player. Bryant will team up with Hinrich, Deng, Wallace and Nocioni (or Joe Smith) as the starting five.

This will be the best possible offer available in market right now, in terms of value for return (even better if Chicago is willing to include Deng or Hinrich) and Bryant has already given his consesus to play for the Bulls. The problem with the Bulls is whether they will find good enough player to fill the void (much like what Boston have gone through).

The experts analyse that possible trade will not happen till the season ends. If, however, the above scenerio does materialise, it will still be a three-teams race to the conference final. But fighting for better seeding in playoff will likely be at top of the list for each team right from the start.

It is going to be a fantastic season to watch.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Now and Then



Let the comparison begins ...